Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting an Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
نویسندگان
چکیده
منابع مشابه
Arguing over Goals for Negotiation: Adopting An Assumption-Based Argumentation Decision Support System
Negotiations occur in procurement, commerce, health and government, among organisations (companies and institutions) and individuals. For instance, electronic procurement (respectively electronic commerce) consists of business-to-business (respectively business-to-customer) purchase and provision of resources or services through the Internet. Typically, organisations and individuals invite bids...
متن کاملRisk, negotiation and argumentation—a decision support system based approach
There has been very little published research on building legal decision support systems to perform risk assessment. Yet one of the principal goals of the law is to reduce risk through the avoidance of litigation. This paper discusses ongoing research on how legal decision support systems can support risk reduction and negotiation. Toulmin’s theory of argumentation is proposed as one technique ...
متن کاملDesign of an argumentation-based negotiation support system
This paper proposes a framework to model the negotiation process using a dialectic based argumentation language, which preserves and captures the qualitative aspects of the negotiation process. The argumentation language helps in representing the structure of the negotiation process and provides a normative argumentative evaluation methodology to represent and capture the roles played by the di...
متن کاملA group decision and negotiation support system for argumentation based reasoning
This paper describes a Group Decision and Negotiation Support System for cooperative or non-cooperative argumentative discourses. The system provides agents means of expressing and weighing their individual arguments and preferences, the aim being the selection of a certain choice. It also supports defeasible and qualitative reasoning in the presence of ill-structured information. Argumentation...
متن کاملDecision Making with Assumption-Based Argumentation
In this paper, we present two different formal frameworks for representing decision making. In both frameworks, decisions have multiple attributes and meet different goals. In the second framework, decisions take into account preferences over goals. We also study a family of decision functions representing making decisions with different criteria, including decisions meeting all goals, most goa...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
ژورنال
عنوان ژورنال: Group Decision and Negotiation
سال: 2012
ISSN: 0926-2644,1572-9907
DOI: 10.1007/s10726-012-9324-4